![]() Delhi’s official Tibet policy is ambiguous with the intention of engaging with the Tibetans without enraging China. ![]() The continued political refuge of the 14 th Dalai Lama and, by extension, the Tibetan Government-in-Exile (TGiE) in India has for decades impacted and strained their bilateral relations. Geopolitically, Tibet’s invasion by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) unequivocally altered India-China relations, particularly impacting their boundary dispute, which is further connected to the Sino-Tibetan conflict.Such a post-Dalai strategy has massive implications not just for China’s international relations, but also the Tibet-China-India dynamic.The CPC has put strategies in place to manage the post-Dalai era: From temple/monastry management rules and education policy changes to restrictions on travel by Tibetans, the Party’s strategies have laid the foundation for preparations to mitigate uncertainties associated with the succession process.The question over the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation reflects the larger polemic ideological and political debates about the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) versus the Communist Party of China (CPC), religious freedom versus materialism, the sovereignty of Tibet versus China’s occupation of it, and history itself. ![]() By China, he is viewed in unflattering terms, ranging from being termed a “splittist” to a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |